Alerts & Updates 1st Jul 2024
The 206th meeting of the Board of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) was held in Mumbai on June 27, 2024. At this meeting, SEBI issued new guidelines for borrowing by Category I and II Alternative Investment Funds (“AIF”). In order to facilitate the ease of doing business and to provide operational flexibility to AIFs, SEBI’s Board approved a proposal to expressly permit Category I and II AIFs to borrow, for a period of upto 30 days, for the purpose of meeting temporary shortfall in drawdown from investors, while making investments. The cost of any such borrowing would need to be charged to the specific investors responsible for the shortfall. Further, with a view to curtail any possible roll-over of borrowing, there shall be a cooling-off period of 30 days between two borrowings availed by Category I and II AIFs.
At present, Regulation 16(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds), 2012 (SEBI AIF Regulations) states that Category I AIFs shall not borrow funds directly or indirectly or engage in any leverage except for meeting temporary funding requirements for not more than 30 days, on not more than four occasions in a year and not more than 10% of its investable funds. Regulation 17(c) of the SEBI AIF Regulations has an identical provision with respect to Category II AIFs.
Though the new guidelines don’t say so in as many words, it is most likely that the new guidelines will replace the existing guidelines and this will be made clear only when the actual amendments are issued by SEBI to implement the decisions taken at its Board meeting.
The key differences between the new (yet-to-be-implemented) and old (existing) guidelines are as follows:
The minutes of the Board meeting held on June 27, 2024 can be found here.
The new guidelines are a reiteration of SEBI’s belief that an AIF should be funded by its investors and not through borrowings. These new guidelines will make it much more difficult for Category I and II AIFs to borrow since the cost of such borrowing has to be met by investors who are already in default! Further, since the borrowing cannot be for a period of more than 30 days, it is assumed that the defaulting investor shall repay within such 30-day period. Banks and NBFCs would hesitate to lend to AIFs on such terms. It is possible that the actual amendments that will be issued by SEBI to implement this new guideline will state that the AIF can repay the loan using the Fund’s corpus and also bear the interest and other costs of borrowing and (seek to) recover the loan and such expenses from the defaulting investors. If so, it would be possible for Category I and II AIFs to borrow, but going forward, the quantum of borrowing by AIFs will be greatly reduced since any borrowing can take place only after an investor(s) has defaulted.
We hope you have found this information useful. For any queries/clarifications please write to us at insights@elp-in.com or write to our authors:
Vinod Joseph, Partner – Email – vinodjoseph@elp-in.com
Paridhi Jain, Associate, Email – paridhijain@elp-in.com
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.