Director’s Liabilities: Navigating Accountability and Corporate Governance Challenges

With questions being raised whether or not to be a director in a company, the article examines the evolving landscape of director liabilities in Indian corporate governance, highlighting the increasing scrutiny faced by both executive and non-executive directors. With over 2.6 million companies in India, the growing responsibilities of directors, particularly independent directors, demand attention. Highlighting key legal precedents and regulatory developments, the article examines statutory obligations under the Companies Act, SEBI regulations, and other corporate laws, shedding light on directors’ roles in governance, compliance, and accountability. It notes a significant contrast in regulatory approaches: while the SEBI order in LEEL Electricals Limited imposed substantial penalties on independent directors, the Supreme Court’s decision in Suseela Padmavathy Amma v. Bharti Airtel Limited provided protection by establishing that mere directorship doesn’t automatically translate to liability.

The article also covers director obligations under other statutes, including FEMA, cybersecurity laws, and labour regulations. It emphasizes that while independent and non-executive directors generally have limited liability (only for acts done with their knowledge or consent), recent cases show increasing accountability on them for governance failures.

The authors conclude that directors must maintain active oversight and robust compliance mechanisms while suggesting that regulatory frameworks may need to evolve to balance effective oversight with protection from undue penalization.

To access the full article, refer to this link