Alerts & Updates 27th May 2019
This week, we analyze the decision of the Supreme Court in Sai Babu v. M/s Clariya Steels Pvt. Ltd, wherein the Supreme Court determined whether an arbitral tribunal can recall its order terminating the arbitration proceedings under section 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”).
Nurturing the objective of section 32 of the Act, the Supreme Court concluded that the arbitral tribunal cannot recall its orders in cases covered by section 32(3) of the Act. With reference to section 15(2) of the Act which provides for the appointment of a substitute arbitrator when the mandate of an arbitrator terminates, the Supreme Court also appointed a substitute sole arbitrator with the consent of parties to determine the subsisting disputes between the parties.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.