Alerts & Updates 18th May 2019
In this week’s update, we analyse the decision of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in the case of SAP India Private Limited v. Cox & Kings Limited.
The judgment of the Court was delivered in a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The question before the Court was, whether it was permissible in law for a party to fill up the vacancy caused on the resignation/recusal of an arbitrator appointed by the Court in exercise of the powers under Section 11(6) of the Act, after the same respondent had earlier refused to nominate an arbitrator in terms of the arbitration agreement between the parties.
The court observed that once a party refuses to appoint an arbitrator at the initial stage, the same would result in complete forfeiture of the right to do so and in such a scenario, it would be the Court who would then appoint the arbitrator.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.