Alerts & Updates 8th Oct 2021

Supreme Court: Courts can determine “Core Preliminary Issues” within the framework of section 11(6-a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Latest Thought Leadership

international trades
Alerts & Updates 30th Apr 2026

India – New Zealand Free Trade Agreement

Read More
Podcasts 30th Apr 2026

ELP Podcast Series: Directors and the Law — An Insider’s View

Read More
Alerts & Updates 29th Apr 2026

Verifiable consent for processing personal data of children under the DPDP Act

Read More
Alerts & Updates 27th Apr 2026

IMPACT OF THE 2026 AMENDMENT TO TRANSGENDER ACT ON EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES

Read More

In this week’s update, we analyze the decision of the Supreme Court in DLF Home Developers Limited v. Rajpura Homes Private Limited & Another with DLF Home Developers Limited v. Begur OMR Homes Private Ltd. & Another. In an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act), the Supreme Court determined (i) whether the disputes arose from the subject agreements; and (ii) whether the disputes arising from two separate agreements that are interlinked, ought to be consolidated under a composite award.

  • The Supreme Court considered the extent of court intervention under Section 11 (6-A) of the Act and inter alia, observed that courts can determine core preliminary issues within the framework of section 11 (6-A) of the Act.

    Read more

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.