Alerts & Updates 25th Mar 2026

SEBI’s Board Approves Amendments to Enhance Flexibility in the Winding Up of AIF Schemes

Authors

Vinod JosephPartner | Mumbai
Paridhi JainAssociate | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

Alerts & Updates 25th Mar 2026

Key Decisions from SEBI’s Board Meeting Dated March 23, 2026

Read More
Alerts & Updates 20th Mar 2026

Press Note 3 Clarified, With a Sting in the Tail

Read More
Alerts & Updates 20th Mar 2026

Supreme Court Strikes Down Age Restriction on Maternity Benefits for Adoptive Mothers

Read More
Alerts & Updates 20th Mar 2026

DELHI SHOPS AND ESTABLISHMENTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2026: OVERVIEW OF KEY AMENDMENTS AND COMPLIANCE IMPLICATIONS

Read More

  • Regulation 29(7) of the SEBI (Alternative Investment Fund) Regulations, 2012 (AIF Regulations) prescribes that after an AIF scheme’s term expires, the assets of the scheme should be liquidated within the liquidation period and the proceeds distributed to investors in the AIF scheme after satisfying all liabilities of the scheme. Regulation 2(1) (pb) of the AIF Regulations defines Liquidation Period as a period of one year following the expiry of the tenure of the scheme. Regulation 29(11) of the AIF Regulations provides that upon winding up of the AIF, its certificate of registration shall be surrendered to the Board. An AIF filing for surrender of its registration is required to submit various documents /declarations, including the AIF’s bank account statement evidencing NIL balance, to SEBI.

    On February 5, 2026, SEBI had issued a consultation paper (Consultation Paper) seeking public comments on proposals aimed at streamlining the processes pertaining to the winding up of AIF schemes and the surrender of AIF registrations. Pursuant to the Consultation Paper, on March 23, 2026, SEBI’s Board approved amendments to the AIF Regulations to permit AIF schemes to retain the liquidation proceeds of their portfolios post completion of their tenure in certain specific circumstances. SEBI’s Board has also approved a framework for tagging certain AIFs as ‘inoperative funds’ with lighter compliance requirements till the surrender of their registration certificates.

    Grounds for retaining funds beyond permissible fund life:

    Once AIF Regulations are amended in line with the decision taken by SEBI’s Board, AIF schemes may retain funds beyond the permissible fund life in the following specific circumstances:

    • Demonstrable receipt of a litigation notice or tax/regulatory demand (including show-cause notices, re-assessment notices, or similar official written communications);
    • Consent of at least 75% of investors by value, for satisfying anticipated liabilities from litigation or tax demand; or
    • Substantiation of amounts retained for operational expenses through invoices or prior-year comparables, subject to a maximum retention period of three years from the end of the permissible fund life.

    Tagging AIFs as “inoperative funds”

    AIFs which intend to surrender registration and have one or more schemes retaining funds under one of the three grounds mentioned above may be tagged as “inoperative”.  The compliance requirements for such funds shall be lesser compared to other AIFs, including discontinuation of periodic filings, PPM updation, and performance benchmarking.

    ELP Comments
    The three specific circumstances in which AIF schemes may retain funds beyond the permissible fund life are on the same lines as those provided in the Consultation Paper, albeit with some minor drafting changes.
    The Consultation Paper had proposed that all such retained monies must be invested only in liquid, high‑quality instruments in line with Regulation 15(f) until final distribution. The minutes of SEBI’s Board meeting don’t have this stipulation, but it is likely to be provided for in the formal amendments to the AIF Regulations.
    The Consultation Paper had also proposed that SEBI should prescribe specific heads of operational expenses for which retention of monies beyond the permissible fund life will be allowed. However, no such prescription can be found in the minutes of SEBI’s Board meeting in this regard.
    With respect to AIFs that are tagged as “inoperative”, the following proposals in the Consultation Paper are not found in the minutes of SEBI’s Board meeting:

    • Inoperative AIFs can apply for the final surrender of registration only after all liabilities are settled and the fund’s bank balance is NIL.
    • During their inoperative phase, monies retained by AIFs should remain subject to investment restrictions under Regulation 15(f).
    • Inoperative funds would be barred from launching new schemes and from charging management fees.
    • AIFs which have not retained any monies beyond the permissible fund life but still exist only for contingent reasons (e.g. possible future inflows from favourable litigation), may also apply for inoperative status in order to align their regulatory burden with their limited residual activities.
    • Amounts retained specifically for operational expenses may be held only for a maximum of three years, after which final settlement and surrender must occur.

    It remains to be seen if the abovementioned proposals will be incorporated in the AIF Regulations when the formal amendments to the AIF Regulations pursuant to the Board meeting are issued.

     

    The minutes of SEBI’s Board meeting held on March 23, 2026, can be found here.

    The Consultation Paper can be found here.

     

    We hope you have found this information useful. For any queries/clarifications, please write to us at insights@elp-in.com  or write to our authors:

    Vinod Joseph, Partner Emailvinodjoseph@elp-in.com

    Paridhi Jain, Associate Emailparidhijain@elp-in.com

Disclaimer: The information contained in this document is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal opinion or advice. This document is not intended to address the circumstances of any individual or corporate body. Readers should not act on the information provided herein without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the facts and circumstances of a situation. There can be no assurance that the judicial/quasi-judicial authorities may not take a position contrary to the views mentioned herein.

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.