Articles 26th Jul 2024

Judgement that will alter both federal and mineral tax landscape

Authors

Gopal MundhraPartner | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 7th Jul 2026

Handling of Client’s Unpaid Securities by Trading Members Clearing Members

Read More
Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 7th Jul 2026

Regulation of IPOs by SEBI and IFSCA – A Comparison

Read More
Newsletter/Booklets 7th Jul 2026

Market Matters – The Antitrust Brief – June 2026

Read More
Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 3rd Jul 2026

SEBI proposes to replace “associate” with “related party” for identifying conflicted transactions in the AIF Regulations

Read More

The nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India, with a decisive 8:1 majority, has ruled on the contentious issue of mineral taxation, overturning previous judgments and clarifying the balance of power between the Union and the States.

The majority verdict declared that royalty on minerals is not a tax but a contractual consideration, and consequently States have the legislative power to tax mineral rights and mineral-bearing lands over and above the collection of royalty under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 (MMDR Act).

To encapsulate on this, our Partner Gopal Krishna Mundhra authors an article on “Judgement that will alter both federal and mineral tax landscape” published by moneycontrol.com.

Read the article here

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.