Articles 26th Jul 2024

Judgement that will alter both federal and mineral tax landscape

Authors

Gopal MundhraPartner | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

Alerts & Updates 17th Jun 2026

New SEBI Rules for Retention of Proceeds and ‘Inoperative Fund’ Status for AIFs

Read More
Newsletter/Booklets 16th Jun 2026

Market Matters – The Antitrust Brief – May 2026

Read More
Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 15th Jun 2026

Draft VCC Structure For GIFT-IFSC Published by the DEA – An Analysis

Read More
Data Privacy
Alerts & Updates 11th Jun 2026

The DPDPA’s Enforcement Gap – Limited Remedies for Data Principles and Independence of the DPB

Read More

The nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India, with a decisive 8:1 majority, has ruled on the contentious issue of mineral taxation, overturning previous judgments and clarifying the balance of power between the Union and the States.

The majority verdict declared that royalty on minerals is not a tax but a contractual consideration, and consequently States have the legislative power to tax mineral rights and mineral-bearing lands over and above the collection of royalty under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 (MMDR Act).

To encapsulate on this, our Partner Gopal Krishna Mundhra authors an article on “Judgement that will alter both federal and mineral tax landscape” published by moneycontrol.com.

Read the article here

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.