Newsletter/Booklets 23rd Aug 2018

IBC | Case Law Alert | NCLT on fixation of exaggerated insolvency resolution cost including resolution professional’s cost | Suggests that IBBI may frame regulations / guidelines

Latest Thought Leadership

Articles 6th Feb 2025

Union Budget 2025 Proposals for the Indian Crypto Industry: Alignment with Global Practices

Read More
Articles 6th Feb 2025

Debut of Track & Trace under Indian GST law fulfilling obligations towards public health

Read More
News & Media 6th Feb 2025

Will INR 12 lakh income qualify for zero tax even with capital gains?

Read More
News & Media 6th Feb 2025

ITR Filing: Know the new Budget 2025 rules for filing updated income tax returns

Read More

The National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench (“NCLT”) in the case of Punjab National Bank vs Divya Jyoti Sponge Iron Private Limited, in its order dated 13 March 2018 (available here), while approving a resolution plan, has taken judicial notice of fixation of exaggerated insolvency resolution cost of a dying corporate debtor, and it has remarked that it is time to have legitimate guidelines or regulation so as to safeguard and to ensure the prospects of revival of a dying corporate debtor not be at a highest cost which cannot be affordable by the corporate debtor.

  • The aforementioned remarks came in light of the facts being dealt at hand by the NCLT where a lump sum amount was approved by the committee of creditors (“CoC”). Following are the few relevant observations of the NCLT:

    1. The NCLT took judicial notice of fixation of exaggerated insolvency resolution cost inclusive of fixation of fees of resolution professional in a lump sum manner by the CoC without applying its mind in regards the fate of corporate debtor, the volume, nature and complexity of the corporate insolvency resolution process (“CIRP”);

    2. Even though the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (“IBBI”) issued guidelines for ‘Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals Recommendation) Guidelines, 2017’ prescribing the professional and ethical standards of an insolvency professional what would be the fee to be charged by the resolution professional is nowhere mentioned in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”), regulations or guidelines;

    3. Normally, the fee of a professional is fixed considering the volume, nature and complexity of the CIRP or the resources available at the disposal of a resolution professional. In the instant case, no such data was placed before the NCLT or by the resolution professional before the CoC;

    4. In view of the aforementioned, the NCLT was of the view that that it is time to have legitimate guidelines or regulation so as to safeguard and to ensure the prospects of revival of a dying corporate debtor not be at a highest cost which cannot be affordable by the corporate debtor, and that the IBBI may consider the above factors to frame the necessary regulations or guidelines in regard of fixation of fees and resolution cost by a resolution professional.

    Please feel free to reach us for views / questions / queries at ibcupdate@elp-in.com.

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.