News & Media 26th Jun 2026

Homebuyer wins full refund with Rs 1.57 crore interest in MahaREAT as Builder delays possession by 3 years, citing MHADA-MCGM dispute

Authors

Heena ChhedaPartner | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

Alerts & Updates 8th Oct 2026

EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF MANDATORY MERCHANT BANKER APPOINTMENT FOR DEBT ISSUED THROUGH PRIVATE PLACEMENT BY CERTAIN LISTED ISSUERS

Read More
international trades
Alerts & Updates 30th Sep 2026

BIS Update: Temporary Suspension of the Linear Alkyl Benzene Quality Control Order

Read More
Alerts & Updates 25th Sep 2026

Key decisions taken in the SEBI Board Meeting dated 24th September 2026

Read More
international trades
Alerts & Updates 24th Sep 2026

ELP Sanctions Update – Foreign Sanctions and Contractual Obligations: Delhi High Court Directs Resumption of SAP Support Services to Nayara Energy

Read More

Our Partner, Heena Chheda shares his insight in ET Wealth, “Homebuyer wins full refund with Rs 1.57 crore interest in MahaREAT as Builder delays possession by 3 years, citing MHADA-MCGM dispute.”

She highlights that the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal’s rulings in this case send a clear, buyer-friendly signal under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). In this case the MahaREAT Tribunal held that the builder could not blame a dispute between MHADA and the BMC, or delays in getting an Occupation Certificate, to justify its failure to hand over possession of the flat on time. The MahaREAT Tribunal applied Section 18 of RERA, and ruled that once the agreed possession date is crossed, the buyer gains a statutory right to interest for the period of delay. Day-to-day approval and coordination problems between government bodies are part of the developer’s own business and project-management risk and cannot be used to avoid paying interest for delayed posession. This judgement confirms that bureaucratic or ‘systemic’ issues including disputes between public authorities do not legally excuse delay in handing over flats, and that, once delay is established, the buyer’s entitlement to interest under Section 18 is statutory and effectively unconditional.

Read the article here

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.