Alerts & Updates 26th Jul 2024

Guarantor Liability under IBC and Contract Act – Critical Gaps in the application of Principle of Subrogation

Authors

Mukesh Chand Senior Counsel | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

Articles 26th Jul 2024

GST Amnesty Scheme: A Positive Step Towards Reducing Litigation before the upcoming GST Tribunal

Read More
News & Media 26th Jul 2024

Judgement that will alter both federal and mineral tax landscape

Read More
News & Media 26th Jul 2024

Mineral merry for states: Centre does not have sole claim on royalties, says Supreme Court

Read More
Podcasts 25th Jul 2024

ELP Podcast Series: Union Budget 2024 and Insurance Sector: A sigh of (GST!) relief

Read More

The question of whether a guarantor is discharged from liability when a resolution plan for the principal debtor is approved under the IBC, has garnered a significant judicial debate.

This update delves into the evolving jurisprudence on the discharge of guarantors, examining the implications under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and exploring the scenarios under the IBC before and after the approval of a resolution plan. The doctrine of subrogation, which allows guarantors to step into the shoes of creditors upon fulfilling the principal debtor’s obligations, faces a critical gap under the IBC.

This inconsistency highlights the need for a legal and policy re-evaluation to align subrogation rights under traditional contract law with the objectives of the IBC, ensuring equitable treatment of guarantors while achieving effective insolvency resolution.

Read the detailed update here