Alerts & Updates 25th Oct 2019
This week, we look at the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Jharkhand v. M/s HSS Integrated SDN & Anr.In the said case, the hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the powers of the court to interfere with an award under sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) while deciding a Special Leave Petition against an order passed under section 37 of the Act.Relying on the decisions in NHAI v. Progressive MVR, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Datar Switchgear Ltd. and Associate Builders v. DDA, the Court observed that the finding of the tribunal in the impugned award having been made after appreciation of evidence and giving cogent reasons, shouldn’t be interfered with unless such finding is perverse or contrary to the evidence on record.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.