News & Media 26th Jun 2026

Homebuyer wins full refund with Rs 1.57 crore interest in MahaREAT as Builder delays possession by 3 years, citing MHADA-MCGM dispute

Authors

Heena ChhedaPartner | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

Alerts & Updates 5th Aug 2026

Bankers’ Books Evidence Bill, 2026: Recasting a 135-Year-Old Evidence Law for Digital Banking

Read More
Newsletter/Booklets 4th Aug 2026

Market Matters – The Antitrust Brief – July 2026

Read More
Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 4th Aug 2026

Recasting India’s Foreign Investment Framework: Key Features of the Draft FI Rules, 2026

Read More
Alerts & Updates 3rd Aug 2026

257th Report of the Rajya Sabha Committee on Subordinate Legislation

Read More

Our Partner, Heena Chheda shares his insight in ET Wealth, “Homebuyer wins full refund with Rs 1.57 crore interest in MahaREAT as Builder delays possession by 3 years, citing MHADA-MCGM dispute.”

She highlights that the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal’s rulings in this case send a clear, buyer-friendly signal under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). In this case the MahaREAT Tribunal held that the builder could not blame a dispute between MHADA and the BMC, or delays in getting an Occupation Certificate, to justify its failure to hand over possession of the flat on time. The MahaREAT Tribunal applied Section 18 of RERA, and ruled that once the agreed possession date is crossed, the buyer gains a statutory right to interest for the period of delay. Day-to-day approval and coordination problems between government bodies are part of the developer’s own business and project-management risk and cannot be used to avoid paying interest for delayed posession. This judgement confirms that bureaucratic or ‘systemic’ issues including disputes between public authorities do not legally excuse delay in handing over flats, and that, once delay is established, the buyer’s entitlement to interest under Section 18 is statutory and effectively unconditional.

Read the article here

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.