Alerts & Updates 3rd Nov 2024

Navigating Settlements and Withdrawals under IBC: Jurisprudence, Practical Challenges, and Strategic Considerations for Banks and Debtors

Authors

Mukesh ChandSenior Counsel | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

banking
Alerts & Updates 26th Jun 2026

RBI Tightens Customer Protection Framework for Fraudulent Electronic Banking Transactions

Read More
Alerts & Updates 26th Jun 2026

The Government of India introduces a transition facilitation mechanism for certain quality Control Orders

Read More
Alerts & Updates 25th Jun 2026

Key Decisions of the SEBI Board Meeting dated June 19, 2026

Read More
Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 23rd Jun 2026

SEBI’s Board Meeting approves GARUDA Mechanism for AIFs

Read More

The Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) aims for structured, timely corporate insolvency resolutions. However, many cases see banks and corporate debtors pursuing settlements during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for quicker creditor recovery and debtor reorganization. This raises legal and operational challenges, particularly with Section 12A and collective action requirements. The Supreme Court in GLAS Trust Company LLC vs. Byju Raveendran and Ors. highlighted the structured withdrawal process post-admission and the limited role of Rule 11 powers. This post explores evolving jurisprudence on IBC settlements, key judgments, and practical tips for compliant, effective settlements.

Read the detailed update here 

 

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.