Alerts & Updates 30th Oct 2019

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/s Tejparas Associates & Exports Pvt. Ltd

Latest Thought Leadership

Alerts & Updates 15th May 2026

Processing employee-related data: Where are the potential boundaries?

Read More
Alerts & Updates 15th May 2026

Consultation Paper on Review of the SEBI (Issue and Listing of Municipal Debt Securities) Regulations, 2015

Read More
Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 14th May 2026

SEBI proposes GARUDA to further speed up launch of schemes by AIFs

Read More
Newsletter/Booklets 11th May 2026

Recent Developments in Direct & Indirect Tax

Read More

This week, we bring to you the decision of the Supreme Court in Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/s Tejparas Associates & Exports Pvt. Ltd. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (Appellant) filed an application to set aside an arbitral award (Application) under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) before a court without jurisdiction i.e. Ld. District Judge, Jaipur (Jaipur Court). In exercise of its powers under Order 7 Rule 10 and Rule 10 A of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC), the Jaipur Court returned the Application to the Appellant with an express direction that the Appellant shall re-present the Application before the courts having jurisdiction i.e. Ld. District Judge, Jodhpur (Jodhpur Court), on 2 April 2008.

  • On 10 April 2008, the Appellant re-presented the application before the Jodhpur Court after the expiry of the period of limitation to file an application under section 34 of the Act. It is relevant to note that the original Application was filed before the Jaipur Court within the time period stipulated under section 34 (3) of the Act.

    In this backdrop, the issue which arose for consideration before the Supreme Court was whether the time period spent in a court without jurisdiction can be excluded when the application under section 34 of the Act is re-presented in a court having jurisdiction. Relying upon Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. v. Union of India, (2019) 2 SCC 455, the Supreme Court concluded that section 14 of the Limitation Act applies to applications under section 34 of the Act. The Supreme Court recognized that the time period spent in a court without jurisdiction can be excluded when the application under section 34 of the Act is re-presented in the court having jurisdiction only if the proceeding was bona fide in the court without jurisdiction.

    Read more

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.