Alerts & Updates 3rd Nov 2024

Navigating Settlements and Withdrawals under IBC: Jurisprudence, Practical Challenges, and Strategic Considerations for Banks and Debtors

Authors

Mukesh ChandSenior Counsel | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

international trades
Alerts & Updates 22nd May 2026

U.S. OFAC Enforcement – Adani Enterprise Limited

Read More
Newsletter/Booklets 22nd May 2026

Recent Developments in Direct & Indirect Tax

Read More
Alerts & Updates 22nd May 2026

Consent Manager under the DPDP Act: A New Institutional Layer for India’s Data Protection Regime

Read More
Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 20th May 2026

Pledging of securities of Non-Discretionary Portfolio Management Services clients – Informal Guidance by SEBI

Read More

The Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) aims for structured, timely corporate insolvency resolutions. However, many cases see banks and corporate debtors pursuing settlements during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for quicker creditor recovery and debtor reorganization. This raises legal and operational challenges, particularly with Section 12A and collective action requirements. The Supreme Court in GLAS Trust Company LLC vs. Byju Raveendran and Ors. highlighted the structured withdrawal process post-admission and the limited role of Rule 11 powers. This post explores evolving jurisprudence on IBC settlements, key judgments, and practical tips for compliant, effective settlements.

Read the detailed update here 

 

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.