Alerts & Updates 6th Mar 2019

ELP Arbitration Weekly Update

Latest Thought Leadership

Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 29th Jul 2026

IFSCA Informal Guidance Addresses Use of PSP Payment Accounts for Fund Subscriptions and Redemptions

Read More
Alerts & Updates 29th Jul 2026

Labour and Employment – Recent Judicial Developments

Read More
Investment Funds
Alerts & Updates 29th Jul 2026

The India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol and the Principal Purpose Test: Treaty Entitlement, Substance and the Post-2017 Investment Landscape

Read More
international trades
Alerts & Updates 24th Jul 2026

USTR Finalises Section 301 Forced Labour Tariffs

Read More

Given is the analysis  of the decision of the Delhi High Court (“Court”) in Cinevistaas Ltd. v. Prasar Bharti. In this decision  the Court concluded that a Section 34 Application was maintainable and directed the Tribunal to take the amended claim petition on record.

  • During the pendency of the arbitration proceedings between Cinevistaas Ltd (“Cinevistaas”) and Prasar Bharti (“Prasar”), Cinevistaas filed an application before the Tribunal, seeking the leave of the Tribunal to amend its Statement of Claim (“Application”). Cinevistaas sought to introduce certain claims which were inadvertently missed out in its Statement of Claim but were previously provided for in the Notice of Arbitration. The Tribunal held that the additional claims were barred by limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963 (“Limitation Act”) and rejected the Application by an Order (“Order”).

    Aggrieved by the Order, Cinevistaas filed an application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Act”) (“Section 34 Application”) before the Court to set aside the Order. The issues which arose for consideration before the Court were (i) whether the Application ought to be allowed by the Tribunal; and (ii) whether the Order constituted an ‘interim award’ under section 2(1) (c) of the Act and was therefore amenable to challenge under section 34 of the Act.

    In the interest of completing the arbitration proceedings in a time bound manner, the Court remitted the matter to Tribunal with a guideline to dispose the arbitration proceedings within 12 months from the date of first appearance before the Tribunal.

    Read more

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.