Alerts & Updates 17th Jul 2025

DGFT issues Trade Notice seeking inputs on draft Management System Requirements for Internal Compliance Programme for export of dual-use (SCOMET) items

Authors

Ambarish SathianathanPartner | Mumbai
Sanjay NotaniPartner | Mumbai
Harika BakarajuAssociate Partner | Mumbai
Shantanu SinghAssociate | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

Alerts & Updates 8th Oct 2025

European Union – Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties on Stainless Steel Cold-Rolled Flat Products from Indonesia [WT/DS616/R]

Read More
News & Media 8th Oct 2025

Universities struggle to grow their endowment funds as a multitude of regulations and beaurocratic roadblocks keep potential donations and gifts from compounding

Read More
News & Media 8th Oct 2025

CCI’s proposed ‘self-audit’ framework for AI ‘unique’ as compared to other jurisdictions: Experts

Read More
Alerts & Updates 6th Oct 2025

Trade Update – October 6, 2025

Read More

  • Dear Reader,
    We are writing to you with an important update concerning the Special Chemicals, Organisms, Materials, Equipment and Technologies (SCOMET) policy. The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has circulated a draft document containing Management System Requirements for Internal Compliance Program for the exports of dual-use items and is seeking stakeholder consultations.

  • Background The DGFT maintains the SCOMET list, which includes dual-use items i.e., the goods, software, and technologies, that can be used for both civilian and military applications, including as weapons of mass destruction. The list is organized into eight (8) categories. Export of SCOMET list items is permitted only with export authorization from the government, unless the item concerned is specifically exempted or prohibited for export.

    In order to remove the need for a case-to-case basis pre-export authorization for the export/re-export of certain SCOMET Items/Software/Technology, the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) introduced the option of seeking general authorizations including the Global Authorization for Intra-Company Transfers (GAICT) or the General Authorization for export after repair (GAER) issued by the DGFT, and the Open General Export License (OGEL) issued by the Department of Defence Production (DDP).

    While submitting applications for these general authorizations, applicants are required to submit a certified or approved Internal Compliance Program (ICP) of the organization as an application pre-requisite. An ICP provides an organization’s internal policies and procedures to ensure necessary compliance with export control laws and regulations.

    Features of DGFT’s draft management system requirements for ICPs The DGFT, vide Trade Notice No. 07/2025-26 dated July 14, 2025, has circulated the draft document containing management system requirements for ICPs (ICP MSRs). The purpose of the ICP MSRs is to assist organizations identify and minimize risks associated with export or transfer of dual-use items, and to ensure compliance with national export controls laws and regulations. Its notable features are as below:

    • Scope: The ICP MSRs provide a strong framework to guide organizations in developing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving effective ICPs.
    • Normative References: The ICP MSRs refer to norms contained in the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992, the FTP, the DGFT’s SCOMET policy, the Best Practice Guidelines (2011) issued under the Wassenaar Arrangement, guidelines issued under the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) and relevant ISO standards.
    • Terms and Definitions: The ICP MSRs provides an explanation of terms commonly used in ICPs, in plain language and by relying on ISO standards, adapted for Indian export controls.
    • Context of the Organization: The ICP MSRs recognise that the development of an organization’s ICP is influenced by features of the organization itself and the needs of the government regulator. Moreover, it is recognised that when developing their internal Compliance Management Systems, organizations may consider and build on existing guidance under the Wassenaar Arrangement, United States Department of Commerce and the European Commission.
    • Leadership: The ICP MSRs recognise the importance of strong leadership through an organization’s top management’s formal commitment, clear understanding of roles and responsibilities, a documented service quality policy, and training to ensure adherence to export control regulations.
    • Planning the Service Deliver: The ICP MSRs note that each organization can plan its service delivery by instituting measures to identify and mitigate export control risks by screening, setting measurable compliance goals, managing changes to ICPs effectively, and recognising that implementing robust ICPs aligns with the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
    • Support: The ICP MSRs state that organizations must support its ICP by allocating adequate resources, ensuring staff competence and awareness through training, maintaining clear communication, and establishing robust systems for creating, managing, and controlling export control documentation.
    • Operation: The ICP MSRs recognise that organizations must plan, implement, and control compliance operations by integrating security measures, monitoring logistics, and establishing a transparent system for handling complaints and incidents related to export control compliance.
    • Performance Evaluation and Improvement: The ICP MSRs note that organizations must evaluate ICP performance through periodic reviews, audits and management assessments to ensure ICP effectiveness, identify non-compliance and implement corrective actions.

    The DGFT has also provided a case study in implementation of an ICP by a technology manufacturing company in Annex A of the ICP MSRs.

    ELP’s Preliminary Remarks Organizations engaged in the export or transfer of dual-use items will benefit by instituting ICPs for the purpose of complying with Indian export controls laws and regulations. The ICP MSRs circulated by the DGFT are a step towards helping such organizations build effective ICPs. At the same time, the DGFT’s draft ICP MSRs come at a time when regulatory changes are afoot in global export controls and the risk of regulatory fragmentation must be taken into consideration.
    Way Forward/What should companies do? While we at ELP would be making our comments to the DGFT, we would request Stakeholders to also contribute their comments within a specified period of 8 days (i.e., until 24 July 2025) from the date of the Trade Notice to submit their comments to scomet-dgft@gov.in.
  • For any queries or comments on this update, please feel free to contact us at elptrade@elp-in.com or the authors: sanjaynotani@elp-in.com, ambarishsathianathan@elp-in.com, harikabakaraju@elp-in.com and shantanusingh@elp-in.com.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this update is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal opinion or advice. Readers are requested to seek formal legal advice prior to acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.