Articles 2nd Jun 2021

Classification of Parts & Accessories – A Conundrum in the Waiting

Authors

Jignesh Ghelani Partner | Mumbai

Latest Thought Leadership

News & Media 26th Apr 2025

Dailyhunt’s parent VerSe’s group CFO resigns amid other exits in finance team

Read More
Alerts & Updates 25th Apr 2025

RBI’s Draft Directions on Securitisation of Stressed Assets, 2025 (Released on April 9, 2025)

Read More
Newsletter/Booklets 22nd Apr 2025

Competition Law & Policy Newsletter for Q1 of 2025

Read More
Alerts & Updates 22nd Apr 2025

Implementation of the Cape Town Convention in India: A Legal Framework for Protection and Enforcement of Security Interests in Aircraft

Read More

The issue of classification of parts and accessories has always been a bone of contention which has plagued a plethora of tax payers as well as the Department at large. Economic Laws Practice’s Jignesh Ghelani (Partner) and Ashwin Ramesh (Principal Associate). In their article with TIOL , the authors analyze the recent Supreme Court judgment in the case of WestingHouse Saxby Farmer Ltd, on the classification of  ‘relays’ manufactured by the assessee.

Jignesh shed light on the implication of the judgment and the applicability of ‘General Rules for Interpretation of the First Schedule’ (GIR) in classification of parts. Finally, the authors also discuss the road ahead for the conundrum and how the judgement opens the pandora box of classification disputes, for various sectors.

Read More 

Privacy Policy

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Economic Laws Practice (ELP) of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of ELP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.