Notification No. 51/2018-Central Tax dated September 13, 2018 (Date of applicability of TCS)
– Notifies October 1, 2018 as the date on which provisions related to TCS under section 52 of the CGST Act shall come into force.
Notification No. 50/2018-Central Tax dated September 13, 2018 (Date of applicability of TDS)
– Notifies October 1, 2018 as the date on which provisions related to TDS under section 51 of the CGST Act shall come into force. The notification also notifies additional categories of taxpayers who shall comply with the TDS provisions in addition to those already specified in section 51
Notification No. 49/2018-Central Tax dated September 13, 2018 (Format for Reconciliation Statement)
– Notifies format of Reconciliation Statement under Form GSTR-9C. The Reconciliation Statement covers details in respect of the following:
Notification No. 48/2018-Central Tax dated September 10, 2018 (Extension of due date)
– Extends the date for submitting the declaration electronically in FORM GST TRAN-1 till March 31, 2019, in respect of registered taxpayers who could not submit the said declaration by the due date on account of technical difficulties on the common portal and in respect of whom the Council has made a recommendation for such extension.
– Taxpayers submitting TRAN-1 as per above timelines may submit the statement in FORM GST TRAN-2 by April 30, 2019
Notification No. 47/2018-Central Tax, Notification No. 46/2018-Central Tax, Notification No. 45/2018-Central Tax dated September 10, 2018 (Extension of due date)
– Extends the time limit for furnishing return in FORM GSTR-3B for the period from July 2017 to November 2018 till December 31, 2018 for taxpayers who have obtained GSTIN in terms of Notification No. 31/2018–Central Tax dated August 06, 2018
Notification No. 44/2018-Central Tax dated September 10, 2018 (Extension of due date)
– Extends the time limit for furnishing the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 for registered taxpayers having aggregate turnover of more than 1.5 crore rupees
|Class of Taxpayer||Month||Extended Due Date|
|All Taxpayer||July 2017 to September 2018||October 31, 2018|
|All Taxpayer||October 2018 to March 2019||11th of succeeding month|
|Taxpayers who have obtained GSTIN in terms of Notification No. 31/2018–Central Tax||July 2017 to November 2018||December 31, 2018|
Notification No. 43/2018-Central Tax dated September 10, 2018 (Extension of due date)
– Extends the time limit for furnishing the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 for registered taxpaers having aggregate turnover upto 1.5 crore rupees
|Class of Taxpayer||Quarters||Extended Due Date|
|All Taxpayer||July 2017 to September 2018||October 31, 2018|
|All Taxpayer||October 2018 to March 2019||31st of month succeeding the quarter|
|Taxpayers located in Kerala, Mahe and Kodagu||July 2018 to September 2018 N||November 15, 2018|
|Taxpayers who have obtained GSTIN in terms of Notification No. 31/2018–Central Tax||July 2017 to September 2018 D||December 31, 2018|
The National Anti-profiteering authority (NAA) has passed its order dated 07 September 2018 in the matter pertaining to a distributor of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) for not passing on the benefit of reduction in GST rate of vaseline (‘product’) from 28% to 18%;
– It was observed that the distributor had not passed on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax by commensurately reducing the price of the product. Rather the distributor had increased the base price and kept the sale price constant even when the GST rate was reduced by 10%.
– The distributor had contented that HUL has increased base price of the product in its software and hence he was bound to charge increased base price at time of issuing invoices. The distributor had also contended that the excess ITC was credited by him to HUL and HUL has in turn deposited the same with consumer welfare fund (‘CWF’).
– NAA Held that the distributor was indulged in profiteering in violation of section 171 of the CGST Act and had not passed on the benefit of reduction of tax to his customers.
– The distributor was directed to
I. Immediately reduce the sale price of product commensurate to the reduction in the rate of tax;
II. Return the amount of profiteering along with interest @ 18% to identifiable recipients;
III. Deposit to the amount of profiteering along with 18% interest to CWF in case where recipients could not be identified if the same has not been deposited by HUL.
– The NAA also held that Director General of Anti-profiteering (‘DGAP’) was to ensure whether amount pertaining to profiteering had been deposited by HUL on behalf of the distributor to CWF and to have the distributor deposit any balance amount
– The NAA has also issued a show cause notice to the distributor as to why penalty should not be imposed on him.
Ministry of Finance – Circular no. 62/36/2018-GST dated September 12, 2018
– CBIC issues clarification regarding levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (‘PSLC’).
– This was necessary due to various representations have been received from trade and industry regarding the mechanism for discharging tax liability and GST rate applicable on trading of PSLC for the period July 01, 2017 to May 27, 2018 (’subject period’).
– It is clarified that GST on PSLCs for the subject period will be paid by the seller bank on forward charge basis and GST rate of 12% will be applicable on the said supply
Disclaimer: The information provided in this update is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal opinion or advice. Readers are requested to seek formal legal advice prior to acting upon any of the information provided herein. This update is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or corporate body. There can be no assurance that the judicial/ quasi-judicial authorities may not take a position contrary to the views mentioned herein.
SC Rules: When a dispute resolution clause provides that...
In this week’s alert we update our readers on what has...
In this week’s update, we analyse a recent judgment of...
This week, we have analyzed the Bombay High Court’s...